Forward this to geronimo community too. Do we want to pick up the fixes in Geronimo Connector 3.1.1-SNAPSHOT for coming geronimo 3.0 beta release ?
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 6:36 PM, Jonathan Gallimore < jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: > Swapped over to Geronimo connector 3.1 - most stuff looks ok, but the > TransactionRollbackCauseTest unit test fails with this earlier version. We > had previously upgraded to 2.2.2-SNAPSHOT to support the rollback cause: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1097964 - I then > upgraded to 3.1.1-SNAPSHOT after that. > > What's the view here - should we go for 3.1 and change/comment out the test > until a newer connector is published, or is it preferably to try and get a > newer version of the connector published. > > Jon > > On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Jonathan Gallimore < > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I'll give trunk a try with connector 3.1.1 today and report back. I did a > > fair bit of work on the connector support in openejb, and just went for > the > > latest snapshot of geronimo connector at the time. I think 3.1.1 will > > probably be fine. > > > > If everyone is happy then I'll kick of the release process for a beta > once > > xbean is published. Please shout if there's any problem with that. > > > > Jon > > On Aug 27, 2011 2:13 AM, "Shawn Jiang" <genspr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Thank you for volunteering ! Geronimo will publish xbean soon. But is > > > connector 3.1.1-SNAPSHOT a must-have ? > > > > > > can we use connector 3.1.1 for the openejb beta for now ? > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > > From: Shawn Jiang <genspr...@gmail.com> > > > Date: Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 9:11 AM > > > Subject: Re: Trunk beta release > > > To: d...@openejb.apache.org, dev@geronimo.apache.org > > > > > > > > > Thank you for volunteering ! Geronimo will publish xbean soon. But is > > > connector 3.1.1-SNAPSHOT > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 3:06 AM, Jonathan Gallimore < > > > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >> I think it would be great to get some kind of alpha/beta/milestone > > release > > >> out. > > >> > > >> We deliberately keep the examples on a different version number to > > openejb, > > >> as there shouldn't be any dependency there, but we create an examples > > zip > > >> at > > >> release time as well as everything else I believe. > > >> > > >> I'm not too sure about javaee-api - obviously it follows the javaee > > >> version. > > >> My guess is we could choose to push that at the same time as the > > everything > > >> else as well. > > >> > > >> I think we'd need xbean and geronimo connector publishing first. > > >> > > >> I'm happy to volunteer to do the release work, if that's any help. > > >> > > >> Jon > > >> On Aug 26, 2011 7:15 AM, "Shawn Jiang" <genspr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > Anyway, let's start to do this and figure how rough the trunk is > step > > by > > >> > step. the first step would be to clean the snapshot depencencies up: > > >> > > > >> > <xbeanVersion>3.8-SNAPSHOT</xbeanVersion> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > <org.apache.openwebbeans.version>1.1.1-SNAPSHOT</org.apache.openwebbeans.version> > > >> > > > <geronimo.connector.version>3.1.1-SNAPSHOT</geronimo.connector.version> > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > There are also some internal compoents that are using different > > version > > >> then > > >> > 4.0.0-SNAPSHOT. > > >> > > > >> > <javaee-api.version>6.0-SNAPSHOT</javaee-api.version> > > >> > > > >> > some samples in trunk are using 1.1-SNAPSHOT, But I can find part of > > them > > >> > are still 1.0-SNAPSHOT. > > >> > > > >> > I'm not sure what's the pratice to release javaee-api and samples > when > > >> they > > >> > don't share the same version with trunk. > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 1:58 PM, David Blevins < > > david.blev...@gmail.com > > >> >wrote: > > >> > > > >> >> I suspect that even if we get started now, it will still be a few > > weeks > > >> >> before we see anything. It's been over a year on trunk with no > > release. > > >> >> It's going to be rough. > > >> >> > > >> >> Best case scenario, we get two releases out before October. Worst > > case > > >> >> scenario, we wait too long to start and don't get any. > > >> >> > > >> >> -David > > >> >> > > >> >> On Aug 25, 2011, at 10:49 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote: > > >> >> > > >> >> > Don't know if geronimo can wait until javaone. We could release a > > >> >> openejb > > >> >> > m1/beta1, and then release a m2/beta2 for javaone. > > >> >> > > > >> >> > On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau > > >> >> > <rmannibu...@gmail.com>wrote: > > >> >> > > > >> >> >> maybe we should wait just before javaone? > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> - Romain > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> 2011/8/26 Shawn Jiang <genspr...@gmail.com> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >>> Geronimo is going to make a beta release. Let's discuss a > openejb > > >> >> >> trunk > > >> >> >>> release again. > > >> >> >>> > > >> >> >>> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 9:00 AM, David Blevins < > > >> >> david.blev...@gmail.com > > >> >> >>>> wrote: > > >> >> >>> > > >> >> >>>> Would be excellent if we could get a beta ready before this > > >> >> >> presentation > > >> >> >>> on > > >> >> >>>> the 25th: > > >> >> >>>> > > >> >> >>>> http://www.oscon.com/oscon2011/public/schedule/detail/20105 > > >> >> >>>> > > >> >> >>>> Might be kind of tight, but ideally there would be at least > > >> something > > >> >> >>> there > > >> >> >>>> for people to download and play with. > > >> >> >>>> > > >> >> >>>> -David > > >> >> >>>> > > >> >> >>>> > > >> >> >>>> > > >> >> >>> > > >> >> >>> > > >> >> >>> > > >> >> >>> > > >> >> >>> -- > > >> >> >>> Shawn > > >> >> >>> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > -- > > >> >> > Shawn > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > -- > > >> > Shawn > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Shawn > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Shawn > > > -- Shawn
