On Oct 17, 2011, at 1:20 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote: > > Should we name this release to 3.0-beta-1 just like what openejb did for > 4.0-beta-1 ? thoughts ?
If we'd like, that's fine. But, don't know that it's required... Could always have a beta, followed by beta-2... Or is there some ordering problem, that I'm not realizing? --kevan
