How are the exsd files created? E.g.
geronimo-eclipse-plugin-3.0-beta-1/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.jaxbmodel.common/schema/JAXBUtilsProvider.exsd
The underlying question is -- do they require a source license header? If they
are automatically generated from other sources, then they do not require a
license header. However, if they are generated by hand, then they probably do
require a license header…
Note that the following text in the NOTICE file should not be there (not a big
deal, I think, but should be cleaned up):
=========================================================================
== NOTICE file corresponding to section 4(d) of the Apache License, ==
== Version 2.0, in this case for the Apache Geronimo distribution. ==
=========================================================================
So far, I can't get a build to work. I'm getting:
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:2.0.2:compile (default-compile)
on project org.apache.geronimo.runtime.common: Compilation failure: Compilation
failure:
[ERROR]
/Users/kevan/tmp/release/geronimo-eclipse-plugin-3.0-beta-1/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.runtime.common/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/runtime/common/log/Logger.java:[21,31]
package org.eclipse.core.runtime does not exist
...
--kevan
On Nov 17, 2011, at 10:39 PM, han hongfang wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> Please help to review and vote on the release of Geronimo Eclipse Plugin
> (GEP) 3.0-beta-1 RC1.
>
> GEP 3.0-beta-1 supports Geronimo server 3.0-beta-1, 2.2.1, 2.1.7 and Eclipse
> Indigo (3.7).
>
> [Known issue] GEP 3.0-beta-1 uses maven-eclipsepde-plugin v1.1, which means
> it can not be built successfully on 64bit win7 and 64bit macos. See following
> JIRAs for details.
> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-737 Could not build
> GEP3.0 under win7-64bit
> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-674 Could not build
> GEP3.0 under macos-64bit
>
> The source code zip is here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-206/org/apache/geronimo/devtools/geronimo-eclipse-plugin/3.0-beta-1/geronimo-eclipse-plugin-3.0-beta-1-source-release.zip
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-206/org/apache/geronimo/devtools/geronimo-eclipse-plugin/3.0-beta-1/geronimo-eclipse-plugin-3.0-beta-1-source-release.tar.gz
>
> The tag is here:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/tags/geronimo-eclipse-plugin-3.0-beta-1
>
> The deployable zip file is here:
> http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/eclipse/3.0-beta-1/geronimo-eclipse-plugin-3.0-beta-1-deployable.zip
>
> The update site zip file is here:
> http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/eclipse/3.0-beta-1/geronimo-eclipse-plugin-3.0-beta-1-updatesite.zip
>
> The p2 repo zip file is here:
> http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/eclipse/3.0-beta-1/geronimo-eclipse-plugin-3.0-beta-1-p2repo.zip
>
> If you would like to review and/or comment on the release notes, you can find
> it here:
> http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/eclipse/updates/PLUGIN_RELEASE-NOTES-3.0-beta-1.txt
>
> Finally, I've created a Staging Site that can be used to test the update
> manager functions of Eclipse (Indigo and helios):
> http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/eclipse/updates/
>
> The vote will be open for the 72-hour minimum.
>
> [ ] +1 about time to push this out the door
> [ ] 0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 not this one (please explain why)
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> Han Hong Fang (Janet)
> hanhongfang AT apache.org
>
>
