The binary license files are located in karaf-framework module, I missed updating them.
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 5:13 AM, Kevan Miller <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi Forrest, > Things look really, really good. I think we need a few minor adjustments > to the LICENSE file. During my first review, I found a number of issues. > Then typing this note, things looked much better. Took me a few minutes to > realize why… The source and binary LICENSE files are different. It looks > like the binary LICENSE is old. I like the source license file. I only see > one problem with the source LICENSE file. I don't see WINK listed. > > Once the LICENSE issue is resolved, looks like I'll be +1. Until then, > here's my -1. > > Everything else -- RAT, signature/checksums, build, and some simple tests > looked good. > > Nice work everyone! > > --kevan > > On Jun 28, 2012, at 12:46 AM, Forrest Xia wrote: > > > Hi Devs, > > > > Through a long time release preparation and perform, finally I made the > Geronimo version 3.0.0 ready for vote here. Note that only Tomcat > assemblies are available for this release. > > > > The server code up for vote is: > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-284/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0.0/geronimo-3.0.0-source-release.tar.gz > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-284/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0.0/geronimo-3.0.0-source-release.zip > > > > Staging repo is: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-284 > > > > The tag has created at: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/geronimo-3.0.0 > > > > The tcks will be triggered against this release soon... > > > > Vote will be at least open for 72 hours. > > [ ] +1 approve > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > > > -- > > Thanks! > > > > Regards, Forrest > > > > -- Thanks! Regards, Forrest
