> Hi Mark, > I'd suggest you start working in geronimo/specs. If you can submit an > incremental patch or two, that would be cool.
Hi Kevan! Well, I better just svn copy it over to owb and do the hack over there. It's really pure pita to do such changes via patches in SVN. Again: as you know we developed the original version in OWB and I know from this experience that it's not a quick change but will take a month or two with going back and forth, doing all the TCK, etc. That's not going to work out via patches I fear :/ Of course we will svn move this back to geronimo/specs once we are finished! That way we also do not loose any history, etc LieGrue, strub ----- Original Message ----- > From: Kevan Miller <[email protected]> > To: [email protected]; Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > Cc: > Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 3:41 PM > Subject: Re: CDI-1.1 api > > > On Nov 27, 2012, at 8:42 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: > >> Hi folks! >> >> We (OpenWebBeans) is starting to adopt CDI-1.1 and thus need to tweak and > document the CDI-1.1 API. >> I'm one of the original main authors of the atinject and jcdi API > packages before they got moved over to geronimo/specs. I'm also on the CDI > EG and OWB PMC member. In other words: I know what to tweak ;) >> >> How should we proceed? Either you folks give me commit rights on the jcdi > modules or I will copy them back over to OWB so we are able to maintain them. > After the work is done we will move them back over here. >> >> wdyt? > > Hi Mark, > I'd suggest you start working in geronimo/specs. If you can submit an > incremental patch or two, that would be cool. > > Regardless, I expect that the minor obstacle can be remedied in relatively > short > order… > > --kevan >
