Thanks Mark. One favor?

Please indicate the source that is being voted on. In this case, I believe it 
would be:

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-004/org/apache/geronimo/genesis/genesis/2.1/genesis-2.1-source-release.zip

and

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-004/org/apache/xbean/xbean/3.13/xbean-3.13-source-release.zip

--kevan


On Mar 8, 2013, at 3:59 AM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> wrote:

> FYI: here is the new staging repo. Will tinker the mail soon
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-004/
> 
> LieGrue,
> strub
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>
>> To: "dev@geronimo.apache.org" <dev@geronimo.apache.org>
>> Cc: 
>> Sent: Friday, March 8, 2013 8:30 AM
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] [CANCELLED] Release genesis-2.1 and xbean-3.13
>> 
>> T xs for catching this!
>> I gonna reroll after this has been fixed. 
>> 
>> It seems the 2 genesis modules you mentioned are not even in the <modules> 
>> section since quite some time. Thus I gonna delete them from SVN if noone 
>> objects. 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Btw, the whole genesis project seems to be in a very bad shape. It e.g. 
>> references a geronimo-genesis-skin in the site which does not exist!
>> Gonna just drop it for now...
>> 
>> 
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>> 
>>> ________________________________
>>> From: Jarek Gawor <jga...@gmail.com>
>>> To: dev <dev@geronimo.apache.org>; Mark Struberg 
>> <strub...@yahoo.de> 
>>> Sent: Friday, March 8, 2013 6:09 AM
>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release genesis-2.1 and xbean-3.13
>>> 
>>> Thank you for putting this all together! However, I did find a few problems:
>>> 
>>> -1 for genesis. 1) geronimo-maven-plugin and geronimo-skip have
>>> SNAPHOST parents. If these are no longer needed then we should drop
>>> them from svn and not release them. 2) There is pluginRepository
>>> defined which points to
>>> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository which is no
>>> longer in use. I think that can be removed all together or at least
>>> changed to the nexus snapshot repository.
>>> 
>>> -1 for xbean. In xbean I put in temporary repository/plugRepositry
>>> entries for apache snapshots repository so that genesis snapshots
>>> could be picked up (in the room pom.xml). Now that we are releasing
>>> genesis, those two repository entires are not needed anymore.
>>> 
>>> Thanks again,
>>> 
>>> Jarek
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> 
>> wrote:
>>>> Hi!
>>>> 
>>>> I'd like to call a VOTE on genesis-2.1 and xbean-3.13.
>>>> 
>>>> The Maven Staging Repo which contains both releases (xbean needs 
>> genesis):
>>>> 
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-001/
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> SVN source tag for genesis:
>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/genesis/tags/genesis-2.1/
>>>> 
>>>> SVN source tag for xbean:
>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/tags/xbean-3.13/
>>>> 
>>>> Source releases (plus hashes) are available under:
>>>> 
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-001/org/apache/geronimo/genesis/genesis/2.1/
>>>> 
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-001/org/apache/xbean/xbean/3.13/
>>>> 
>>>> My PGP release key 2FDB81B1 is available at
>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/KEYS
>>>> 
>>>> Kevan is so kind and will collect the JIRA bits (I have absolutely no
>>>> oversight about how to gather all the needed infos there).
>>>> 
>>>> The VOTE will be open for 72 hours.
>>>> [ ] +1 approve
>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>> [ ] -1 veto (and reason why)
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> There is a small (and old) guide for testing staged releases:
>>>> http://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-testing-releases.html
>>>> 
>>>> In practice it's as easy as adding a profile to your 
>> ~/.m2/settings.xml
>>>> which contains the <repository> with the URL pointing to the 
>> staging repo as
>>>> posted above.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> txs and LieGrue,
>>>> strub
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 

Reply via email to