Agree Jarek's point, it's better to roll out a quick release with some important fixes that users want.
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Jarek Gawor <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, current set of dependencies. I'm worried that once we start > upgrading the versions of the various dependencies it will take weeks > or months to resolve the problems caused by the upgrade. So for now I > would rather focus on getting something out especially since things > appear to be in a decent shape. Of course, if there is something that > can be upgraded and it doesn't cause a lot of problems or additional > work - I'm all for it. > > Jarek > > > On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Kevan Miller <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > On May 8, 2013, at 3:00 PM, Jarek Gawor <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I think it's probably a good time to have a new Geronimo 3 release > >> (3.0.1?). We've fixed a bunch of stuff, upgraded Tomcat, OpenJPA, and > >> fixed Java 7 complication issues. TCK is also looking pretty good now. > >> > >> Thoughts? > > > > Sounds great to me. I assume this is with the current set of > dependencies? E.g. OpenEJB 4.0.0-beta-1, xbean 3.11.1, myfaces 2.1.11, etc… > > > > Would be good to run a similar email by the user list… > > > > --kevan > > > -- Thanks! Regards, Forrest
