I will try option 2 first, if not work, will fall back to option 1. Any better idea, please speak out.
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 11:25 PM, Jarek Gawor <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, that's bad. Looks like maven release plugin was executed with > -Pnoclustering option. Which means that the plugin won't process > certain modules (update the version in poms) but since the plugin > creates a tag from the branch, all source code will be included. So if > you build from tag (or source zip or tar.gz) you might end up > compiling code that was skipped by the release plugin. > So, I guess if there is something we don't want to include in a > release, we shouldn't rely on a profile option during a release but > instead either 1) svn delete the modules we don't want before the > release or 2) update poms appropriately so that modules we don't want > aren't compiled by default before the release. > > Or any other better ideas? > > Jarek > > > On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 8:25 AM, Kevan Miller <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > I've been trying off and on to get a clean build since Friday. I'm > currently failing with: > > > > [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project geronimo-clustering-wadi: > Could not resolve dependencies for project > org.apache.geronimo.modules:geronimo-clustering-wadi:bundle:3.0.1-SNAPSHOT: > Could not find artifact > org.apache.geronimo.ext.tomcat:tribes:jar:7.0.39.1-SNAPSHOT in > apache.snapshots (http://repository.apache.org/snapshots) -> [Help 1] > > > > I can try to clean out my maven repo. See if that helps. However: > > > > looks like a lot of pom.xml files have <parent>'s pointing to > 3.0.1-SNAPSHOT. Try running 'grep -Rni --include=pom.xml snapshot *' > > > > --kevan > > > > On May 17, 2013, at 9:56 AM, Forrest Xia <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Hi Devs, > >> > >> Please vote Geronimo 3.0.1 release with these major differences from > the previous release: > >> 1. JSF 2.1 support > >> 2. JDBC 4 support > >> 3. Some components upgrade, including Tomcat, JPA, Yoko, Tranql, > ActiveMQ > >> 4. Quite a few bugs fixes > >> > >> For details, see > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/geronimo-3.0.1/RELEASE_NOTES-3.0.1.txt > >> > >> The server code up for vote is: > >> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-009/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0.1/geronimo-3.0.1-source-release.tar.gz > >> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-009/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0.1/geronimo-3.0.1-source-release.zip > >> > >> The binary code up for vote is: > >> Java EE 6 Full Profile Tomcat Assemblies: > >> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-009/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6/3.0.1/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-3.0.1-bin.tar.gz > >> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-009/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6/3.0.1/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-3.0.1-bin.zip > >> > >> Java EE 6 Web Profile Tomcat Assemblies: > >> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-009/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web/3.0.1/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web-3.0.1-bin.tar.gz > >> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-009/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web/3.0.1/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web-3.0.1-bin.zip > >> > >> Little-G Tomcat Assemblies: > >> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-009/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal/3.0.1/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal-3.0.1-bin.tar.gz > >> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-009/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal/3.0.1/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal-3.0.1-bin.zip > >> > >> Staging repo is: > >> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-009/ > >> > >> The tag has created at: > >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/geronimo-3.0.1 > >> > >> Java EE 6 TCKs all passed! > >> > >> Vote will be at least open for 72 hours. > >> [ ] +1 approve > >> [ ] +0 no opinion > >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > >> > >> -- > >> Thanks! > >> > >> Regards, Forrest > > > -- Thanks! Regards, Forrest
