The most change I could see is for Java 7 support.
2013/5/27 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]> > Out of curiosity, what are the objectives of such a change? > I mean, is there any important improvments on ASM4 we cannot miss? > Is ASM 3 end of life? > > Jean-Louis > > > > 2013/5/27 Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > >> Hi! >> >> A small discussion which popped up on IRC regarding asm4: >> >> Preclusion: ASM3 and ASM4 are _not_ binary compatible but use the same >> packages. >> For preventing some classpath clashes this xbean-asm-shaded package got >> created. This was ASM3 so far. >> >> When moving up to ASM4 we should thus change the package we shade it in, >> e.g. to org.apache.xbean.asm4.* >> I think there is common agreement on this point, right? >> >> I've added a new module of xbean-asm4-shaded which uses ASM4 and shades >> to the aforementioned path. >> But what to do with the asm3 shade? >> >> We now have two options: >> Do we like to >> >> 1.) keep both >> >> >> or do we like to >> >> >> 2.) upgrade whole xbean to ASM4 and remove the old xbean-asm-shaded (and >> only keep xbean-asm4-shaded)? >> >> 2.b) keep the xbean-asm-shaded artifactId but otherwise do like 2.). I >> perso don't like this much as it is not so explicit for users. >> >> LieGrue, >> strub >> > > > > -- > Jean-Louis > -- Ivan
