Ok, PR looks better now: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-specs/pull/2/files
On Fri Jan 02 2015 at 12:37:03 PM John D. Ament <[email protected]> wrote: > Can't, because the PR is still open. > > Let me ping infra. > > > On Fri Jan 02 2015 at 12:33:55 PM Romain Manni-Bucau < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> You can open another one now >> Le 2 janv. 2015 18:24, "John D. Ament" <[email protected]> a écrit : >> >> I've updated the PR after starting to port AMQ6 to the new JAR. Couple >>> of methods were missing and one exception missing. >>> >>> Everything else looks good. >>> >>> JIRA is acting up now, so I couldn't respond on the ticket. >>> >>> John >>> >>> On Fri Jan 02 2015 at 8:00:33 AM Romain Manni-Bucau < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> The same ActiveMQ guy (Taylor IIRC). >>>> >>>> More sure way to contribute it is to create a patch and attach it to a >>>> geronimo issue (surely >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6455) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>> @rmannibucau >>>> http://www.tomitribe.com >>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com >>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau >>>> >>>> >>>> 2015-01-02 13:53 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament <[email protected]>: >>>> > Romain, >>>> > >>>> > Who is him? >>>> > >>>> > As I mentioned, I have the code available if someone wants to tell me >>>> how to >>>> > get it contributed that would be great. >>>> > >>>> > John >>>> > >>>> > On Thu Dec 18 2014 at 8:55:42 AM Romain Manni-Bucau < >>>> [email protected]> >>>> > wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >> Hi >>>> >> >>>> >> Yep, I asked him. We'll need it anyway, at least for tomee >>>> javaee-api 7 >>>> >> jar. >>>> >> >>>> >> Le 18 déc. 2014 14:51, "John D. Ament" <[email protected]> a >>>> écrit : >>>> >> >>>> >>> All, >>>> >>> >>>> >>> A few months ago I worked out a spec JAR for JMS 2.0 APIs, the >>>> purpose >>>> >>> being to include it in apache projects. You can see the code here: >>>> >>> >>>> >>> https://github.com/johnament/geronimo-specs/tree/jms2 >>>> >>> >>>> >>> I'd like to move this into the geronimo specs area and was looking >>>> to >>>> >>> discuss it further. I was reached out to this week by some folks >>>> claiming >>>> >>> to be from the ActiveMQ/HornetQ community, claiming to have spoken >>>> to some >>>> >>> members of the geronimo community about moving this forward. >>>> >>> >>>> >>> Are you in fact interested in this donation? >>>> >>> >>>> >>> Thanks, >>>> >>> >>>> >>> John >>>> >>>
