Thanks, just making sure my report is correct. :)
Regards, Alan > On Apr 6, 2015, at 12:34 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yes they have been > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> > | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber > <http://www.tomitribe.com/> > 2015-04-06 21:21 GMT+02:00 Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>: > We need to follow up w/ a [RESULT]. Did the artifacts get pushed out? > > > Regards, > Alan > > >> On Apr 6, 2015, at 8:12 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Think i did then >> >> Le 6 avr. 2015 16:49, "Mark Struberg" <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> a écrit : >> Remain sent the tally but forgot to change the subject to [RESULT]. >> >> >> LieGrue, >> strub >> >> >> > Am 05.04.2015 um 16:46 schrieb Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected] >> > <mailto:[email protected]>>: >> > >> > I was scanning the mailing lists and I don’t think that saw the result. I >> > double checked and found it. :) >> > >> > >> > Regards, >> > Alan >> > >> >> On Apr 5, 2015, at 12:59 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected] >> >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> >> >> Done AFAIK >> >> >> >> Le 4 avr. 2015 21:41, "Alan D. Cabrera" <[email protected] >> >> <mailto:[email protected]>> a écrit : >> >> Time to wrap up this vote? :) >> >> >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Alan >> >> >> >> > On Feb 13, 2015, at 10:25 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected] >> >> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > I imagine since this is an alpha release we won’t be creating a tag. >> >> > Can you at least tell us the svn revision? >> >> > >> >> > +1 - binding >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> On Feb 12, 2015, at 12:43 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau >> >> >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> Hello guys, >> >> >> >> >> >> As stated in the other thread here the vote for the >> >> >> geronimo-jms_2.0_spec module with the fixes from Martyn included. >> >> >> >> >> >> Here is the staging repo: >> >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1013/ >> >> >> >> >> >> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1013/> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> My key can be found as last time at >> >> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/KEYS >> >> >> <https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/KEYS> >> >> >> >> >> >> please VOTE >> >> >> [+1] all fine, ship it >> >> >> [+0] don't care >> >> >> [-1] stop, because ${reason} >> >> >> >> >> >> here is my +1 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> >> >> @rmannibucau >> >> >> http://www.tomitribe.com <http://www.tomitribe.com/> >> >> >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> >> >> >> https://github.com/rmannibucau <https://github.com/rmannibucau> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> > >
