probably a good idea! txs for the input!
LieGrue, strub > Am 21.04.2017 um 18:52 schrieb David Jencks <[email protected]>: > > I’d suggest it go in components next to the tx manager and jaspi. > > david jencks > >> On Apr 21, 2017, at 9:39 AM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I can also commit it to the sandbox for now. With SVN we can easily move it >> around anyway. >> >> txs and LieGrue, >> strub >> >>> Am 21.04.2017 um 18:37 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>: >>> >>> should we get a microprofile sub project? (like xbean) >>> >>> +1 for it, -0 to have all microprofile linked project lost in there own >>> branch >>> >>> >>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | JavaEE Factory >>> >>> 2017-04-18 23:33 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>: >>> or rather recycled blood ;) >>> >>> I finally want to bring the Microprofile Config proposal back to where it >>> belongs - the ASF! >>> >>> I've proposed this code a year ago but didn't push further when it got >>> trash talked and side pulled with mostly unrelated stuff. >>> So here it is again finally! >>> >>> The sources are at https://github.com/struberg/javaConfig >>> All writen by me plus some polishing by Matt Benson and Romain (both ASF >>> members). >>> >>> New module in Geronimo? >>> >>> This currently targets the microprofile-config API (which sadly now went to >>> Eclipse after the 'friendly fire' last year). >>> https://github.com/eclipse/microprofile-config >>> >>> This will probably be the base for an upcoming Config JSR which it will >>> target as well once it sees the light. >>> >>> Wdyt? >>> >>> LIeGrue, >>> strub >>> >> >
