Perfectly fine for me. I'd still give it a different release lifecycle from the 
rest of xbean.
Actually it makes not much sense for the rest of xbean to share the same 
Most of the components do not have any common ground with each other.


> Am 09.08.2017 um 01:11 schrieb David Blevins <>:
> Can we rename Geronimo Config?  I think the name is strongly stuck with the 
> app server.  From experience in EJB land, try to repurpose names is usually 
> an uphill battle.
> If we wanted to go with the grain, we could call it XBean Config.  Open to 
> other names as well.
> If we did call it XBean Config, I’m not sure there’s a need to have the same 
> version as the other xbean components.  We could, but I think 1.0 would still 
> be fine.
> -- 
> David Blevins

Reply via email to