+1 (non binding)
Regards
JB
On 08/31/2017 09:43 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
+1
2017-08-30 21:09 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>:
Picking this up and pushing it further!
After discussing this topic many times and finding no one willing to spend
time to actively evolve nor even maintain the Geronimo Server part I'd say
we should finally call a VOTE:
This is a VOTE to announce the EOL the Geronimo Server parts, mostly
* https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/
<https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/>
* https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/gshell/
<https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/gshell/>
We will also have to update our site, moving most of the current stuff to a
'legacy' area and rework it to focus on the new project agenda: to serve
common EE components for other ASF projects.
We also have a directory which contains binaries (jars) which don't even
have a license information.
We should absolutely get rid of them anyway from our repo!
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/repository/
<https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/repository/>
Note that this vote is only about the Geroniom Server but NOT about the
shared components.
Those components will be further maintained - or moved to a different
project later.
This includes, but is not limited to, the following Geronimo parts:
* the specs
* genesis (parents for xbean and specs)
* xbean
* the components javamail, transaction, config
Those parts WILL STAY,
So please VOTE:
[+1] Publicly announce that the Geroniom Server is EOL (End of Life) and
will not further be maintained but that the Geronimo Project will from now
on focus on reusable Java Enterprise components.
[+0] meh, I don't care
[-1] Nope, stop I need the Geronimo Server and I will ACTIVELY help to
maintain and evolve it in the future!
Here is my +1
LieGrue,
strub
> Am 11.05.2017 um 22:09 schrieb Kevan Miller <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>:
>
> There should be a public vote.
>
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 9:13 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> I think we came to an agreement so far
>
>
> Le mar. 25 avr. 2017 à 00:21, Mark Struberg <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> a écrit :
> Or do we need another formal vote?
>
> If we are all on the same boat, when, how and who is drafting the
Announcement?
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
--
------------------------
Guillaume Nodet
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
[email protected]
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
