+1

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory
<https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>

2017-09-17 9:37 GMT+02:00 David Blevins <[email protected]>:

> How about "MicroProfile component specification" ?
>
> "first implementation of a MicroProfile component specification here at
> Apache"
>
> --
> David Blevins
> http://twitter.com/dblevins
> http://www.tomitribe.com
>
> On Sep 16, 2017, at 11:06 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> "MP specific specification"? MP 1.0 not being anything special (just
> referencing EE without bringing more consistency or features) it can work
> and be less ambiguous than "subcomponent" which means not much to me, wdyt?
>
> Le 17 sept. 2017 05:05, "David Blevins" <[email protected]> a
> écrit :
>
>> On Sep 15, 2017, at 5:43 PM, John D. Ament <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 2:36 PM David Blevins <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sep 14, 2017, at 3:54 AM, John D. Ament <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> as well as being the first release of a MicroProfile specification
>>> implementation here at Apache
>>>
>>>
>>> Note TomEE is the first MP implementation at Apache.  We intentionally
>>> defined MP 1.0 as a subset of the WebProfile so all servers were by default
>>> MP compatible.  TomEE, WildFly, Payara and Liberty were all used in the MP
>>> 1.0 Conference demo and initial presentations.
>>>
>>>
>> Sure, are you asking me to rephrase it? I'm referring to the individual
>> components, rather than the overall MicroProfile umbrella.
>>
>>
>> Yeah, maybe use "first implementation of a MicroProfile sub-component
>> here at Apache" or something similar.
>>
>> MP 1.0, 1.1 are all MicroProfile specifications as well, so someone with
>> that perspective will read "MicroProfile specification implementation"
>> differently than intended.
>>
>>
>> -David
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to