I agree, but then why does Shrinkwrap put the files there? On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 1:07 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> wrote:
> WEB-INF/classes/META-INF yep, (classpath only) > > I think it is normal, we could support WEB-INF/microprofile.properties > but META-INF in a war sounds weird no? > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn > > > 2017-11-30 19:05 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament <[email protected]>: > > I have the following deployment used in an Arquillian test: > > > > @Deployment > > public static WebArchive createDeployment() { > > String propertyName = > SimpleGetApi.class.getName()+"/mp-rest/url"; > > String value = getStringURL(); > > return ShrinkWrap.create(WebArchive.class) > > .addClass(SimpleGetApi.class) > > .addAsManifestResource(new > StringAsset(propertyName+"="+value), > > "microprofile-config.properties") > > .addAsManifestResource(EmptyAsset.INSTANCE, "beans.xml"); > > } > > > > When I use this, Geronimo Config says it can't find the property. When I > > instead change to use a JAR file, it's loaded correctly. > > > > So is this file in the right location in the WAR? > > > > fa5a7db1-3692-4d52-b663-302c2a91241b.war: > > /WEB-INF/ > > /WEB-INF/classes/ > > /WEB-INF/classes/org/ > > /WEB-INF/classes/org/eclipse/ > > /WEB-INF/classes/org/eclipse/microprofile/ > > /WEB-INF/classes/org/eclipse/microprofile/rest/ > > /WEB-INF/classes/org/eclipse/microprofile/rest/client/ > > /WEB-INF/classes/org/eclipse/microprofile/rest/client/tck/ > > /WEB-INF/classes/org/eclipse/microprofile/rest/client/tck/interfaces/ > > > /WEB-INF/classes/org/eclipse/microprofile/rest/client/tck/interfaces/SimpleGetApi.class > > /META-INF/ > > /META-INF/microprofile-config.properties > > /META-INF/beans.xml > > > > Or should GConfig be looking for it in WEB-INF/classes/META-INF? > > > > And the other half of my question, is this a GConfig issue or a MP Config > > issue? > > > > John >
