Yes, idea was to use config if there in right version and skip it with an
info log if not. Will try to check tmr. Thanks for the pointer.

Le 1 janv. 2018 18:51, "John D. Ament" <[email protected]> a écrit :

> You mean for safeguard?  If so its already there.  I do want to move it to
> a separate JAR so maybe OOTB we have a system property backed version?
>
> Take a look for ConfigFacade and MicroProfileConfigFacade.
>
> On Jan 1, 2018 12:37 PM, "Romain Manni-Bucau" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Any hope to have mp config optional before? Was planning to do it before
>> Xmas but didnt get a chance yet to code it. Can try later this week
>> probably.
>>
>> Le 1 janv. 2018 17:19, "John D. Ament" <[email protected]> a écrit :
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 1, 2018 at 11:10 AM Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 go for it!
>>>>
>>>> > Safeguard requires a Config 1.2 implementation to run, since Config
>>>> 1.2
>>>>
>>>> Geronimo-config-1.1  is microprofile-config 1.2, right?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes.  Between the bugs found in the impl and the spec issues I saw,
>>> GConfig 1.0 ended up implementing MP Config 1.1.  I think only IBM shipped
>>> an impl of just Config 1.0.
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> LieGrue,
>>>> strub
>>>>
>>>> > Am 01.01.2018 um 16:34 schrieb John D. Ament <[email protected]>:
>>>> >
>>>> > Hey guys
>>>> >
>>>> > Just pushed up the last of the changes for Safeguard to make it pass
>>>> Fault Tolerance 1.0's TCK.  There's a small change I still want to make it
>>>> to allow the executor to be pluggable, and plan to have a following release
>>>> soon that introduces more configurable properties.
>>>> >
>>>> > With that said, I'm going to plan to stage the Config 1.1 release
>>>> tomorrow and start testing the Safeguard release process (since this'll be
>>>> the first time we're releasing a git repo).  Once that's working, I'll plan
>>>> to stage that release as well.
>>>> >
>>>> > Please note - Safeguard requires a Config 1.2 implementation to run,
>>>> since Config 1.2 introduces common sense converters (for enums in
>>>> particular) and Class converter built in.  I didn't want to register a
>>>> custom converter.
>>>> >
>>>> > John
>>>>
>>>>

Reply via email to