FYI, I have to fixup the current PR because I goofed up, but I'm doing that
now.

On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 5:00 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi Raymond
>
> Does it mean we can drop the providerlocator now?
>

Not with this change.
I believe you are referring to the Service Loader Mediator [1] (like Aries
SpiFly [2]), which I could do as a second PR if that is really wanted.


>
> +1 anyhow for the pr
>

Great! thx

[1] https://osgi.org/specification/osgi.cmpn/7.0.0/service.loader.html
[2] http://aries.apache.org/modules/spi-fly.html


>
>
> Le mar. 15 mai 2018 21:52, Raymond Auge <[email protected]> a
> écrit :
>
>> Hello All,
>>
>> As some of you know several of the OSGi RIs consume the specification
>> bundles produced by the Apache Geronimo project.
>>
>> In the last couple of OSGi releases we've been applying the requirement
>> for Portable Java Contracts as part of new and updated specs. Now as the
>> specs of OSGi Release 7 have finalized we're in need to close out the RIs.
>>
>> To that end I'd like to request the application of the Portable Java
>> Contracts to the Geronimo spec bundles.
>>
>> I've created an issue [1] and sent a PR [2] which makes the necessary
>> changes.
>>
>> Would someone be so kind as to review this?
>>
>> Next, if acceptable, would someone call a release? I'm not sure of the
>> specs can be released all at once, but that would be the best case scenario.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>> - Ray
>>
>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6606
>> [2] https://github.com/apache/geronimo-specs/pull/9
>>
>> --
>> *Raymond Augé* <http://www.liferay.com/web/raymond.auge/profile>
>>  (@rotty3000)
>> Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.* <http://www.liferay.com>
>>  (@Liferay)
>> Board Member & EEG Co-Chair, OSGi Alliance <http://osgi.org>
>> (@OSGiAlliance)
>>
>


-- 
*Raymond Augé* <http://www.liferay.com/web/raymond.auge/profile>
 (@rotty3000)
Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.* <http://www.liferay.com>
 (@Liferay)
Board Member & EEG Co-Chair, OSGi Alliance <http://osgi.org> (@OSGiAlliance)

Reply via email to