jwt-auth and jcache-simple vote sent, will try to add the proxying feature this afternoon in config
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> Le mer. 16 mai 2018 à 08:40, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> a écrit : > In general I'd say that we should support it. > If people make dumb things they are to blame themselves. > Otw it makes sense to support proxies - and if it's only in hindsight of > serialisability! > > This whole paragraph in the spec is basically infantilising our users. > Of course we should probably point them out to the request behaviour, but > that could be in an errata or a hint section as well. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > Am 16.05.2018 um 07:41 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected] > >: > > > > for jwt-auth we need the tck 1.1 (no release yet) > > do we drop tck to release - ensuring it passes before? > > > > For reference https://github.com/eclipse/microprofile-jwt-auth/issues/88 > > > > @Mark: for config, do you think we can support proxies implicitly? If > there is an interface with @ConfigProperty then we create a proxy for it? > Would miss @Configuration but allow to use that pattern already for > startup-config only? wdyt? This is my only blocker to use mp-config and i > can manage almost all other features in a custom source easily. > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book > > > > > > Le lun. 14 mai 2018 à 10:43, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> a écrit : > > +1 > > > > I'd also like to push a new config release. > > > > LieGrue, > > strub > > > > > > > Am 13.05.2018 um 16:06 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < > [email protected]>: > > > > > > Hi guys > > > > > > Id like to release simple jcache and jwt auth soon. > > > > > > Anyone against? Any pending todo? > > > > > > >
