On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 7:01 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> wrote:
> IMHO: > > 1. one single release > 2. java 6 is ok > 3. for the exclusion maybe ping aries, this is the main consumer here > Knowing that I don't have a say, I would gladly through my support behind all of the above. Sincerely, - Ray > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github > <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> > > > Le lun. 4 juin 2018 à 11:57, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> a écrit : > >> Hi folks! >> >> Raymond shipped a great patch to improve our OSGi handling. >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6606 >> >> I've applied the patch, but now we should also do the releases, right? >> >> >> There are quite a few specs which still use java5-flava and some others >> like geronimo-annotation-1.0 which are probably not used anymore at all! >> >> How do we deal with those? >> >> Release with Java8 and hope for bytecode compatibility? >> I could also run the releases with Java6, but that's the oldest jdk I >> still have. >> >> Another question: one big release with all the updates and just one >> single VOTE? >> Or separate votes for each and every spec? >> >> LieGrue, >> strub >> >> -- *Raymond Augé* <http://www.liferay.com/web/raymond.auge/profile> (@rotty3000) Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.* <http://www.liferay.com> (@Liferay) Board Member & EEG Co-Chair, OSGi Alliance <http://osgi.org> (@OSGiAlliance)
