Finally green, I'm not happy of the last commit which kind of use cdi model (AnnotatedType) and enforce rules with reflection (Method/Class) to match the TCK expectation. I didn't see in the spec this is the right behavior and really think it is a weld impl detail which leaked in the spec. Any feedback would be welcomed.
In the meantime we are green :) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> Le mar. 12 juin 2018 à 09:06, Bernd Bohmann <[email protected]> a écrit : > > Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> schrieb am Di., 12. Juni 2018, > 08:32: > >> Hi guys, >> >> Can anyone have a look >> to io.astefanutti.metrics.cdi.se.InheritedTimedMethodBean, i'm not sure i >> get what is wrong for this one. Start to wonder if i missed a rule of if it >> is a weld related test. >> >> If anyone has a few spare cycles i'd be happy to get help for on this - >> either by a direct fix or just pointing me out what is wrong. I'll be on >> IRC in ~40mn if you want to do it more "live". >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github >> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn >> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book >> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> >> >
