A BOM could be definitely useful so we can have a consistent set of impls for a microprofile version. Separate repo seems relevant as well
+1 Le lun. 9 juil. 2018 à 09:32, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> a écrit : > Le lun. 9 juil. 2018 à 08:55, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> a écrit : > >> Or we have this as part of our site? >> > > Works for the site, not for the bom > > >> Or an examples project? >> > > This is not an example but a delivery IMHO > > >> Or having both in one? >> > > Yep, i'd put a new repo with both the site and the bom delivery since it > would be about releases mainly, not "real" code. > > >> >> LieGrue, >> strub >> >> >> > Am 09.07.2018 um 08:35 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < >> [email protected]>: >> > >> > Oops, forgot to mention it wpuld also host the site generation >> (aggregating all repo contents with antora) >> > >> > Le dim. 8 juil. 2018 21:14, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> >> a écrit : >> > Hi guys, >> > >> > I'd like to formalize a bit more the "microprofile repo" discussion so >> I'm opening a new thread. >> > >> > The goal is the following one: get a repository where to put >> transversal code and provide a kind of "bom" or "starter" pom for users >> willing to get geronimo-microprofile-* at once. >> > >> > Originally it would just be one pom but I see it can evolve to manage N >> poms (one per MP version) and potentially some ASF servers enriched with >> the libs (to discuss later probably but it is to share what this repo can >> host). >> > >> > Wdyt? >> > >> > Romain Manni-Bucau >> > @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book >> >>
