If it's not required and causing problems, I'd say yes. Especially because you already fixed it
Le ven. 27 juil. 2018 à 17:31, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> a écrit : > Hi guys, > > A user reported the requirement of jackson in current code (thanks lambdas > :() whereas it is not needed in most of the cases. > I fixed it on master (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6611) > and wonder if we want to release an opanapi 1.0.1 shortly with this fix. > > wdyt? > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github > <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> >
