Same, I took a quick look and it looks good. Regards JB
On 21/09/2018 16:57, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Looks good to me too but only did simple tests > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github > <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> > > > Le ven. 21 sept. 2018 à 16:39, Raymond Auge <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> a écrit : > > Hey Mark, > > Everything looks good for me. > > Sincerely, > - Ray > > On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 8:44 AM Mark Struberg <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > hi folks (especially Raymond and Romain) > Could you please check if the OSGi bits in the validation-2.0 > spec module are proper? > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-validation_2.0_spec/ > > Would love to release it as we need it for the upcoming Apache > BVal-2.0 release. > > > txs and LieGrue, > strub > > > > -- > *Raymond Augé* > <http://www.liferay.com/web/raymond.auge/profile> (@rotty3000) > Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.* > <http://www.liferay.com> (@Liferay) > Board Member & EEG Co-Chair, OSGi Alliance <http://osgi.org> > (@OSGiAlliance) > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré [email protected] http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
