+1 to create our own stuff. I would be more than happy to help on this one !
Regards JB On 03/12/2018 15:24, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hello guys, > > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=geronimo-safeguard.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/api-cdi-tck-refactoring > is now ready and I'd like to move it forward and merge it as our new > master. Here is the proposal > > 1. branch current master in 1.0.x - just to keep the code somewhere > 2. merge the branch on master (1.1-SNAPSHOT would likely become > 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT at the same time) > > I'll be "off" next week so if we can make it this week it is awesome > otherwise I can probably do it the week of the 17th and do a Xmas > release with other implementations. > > Let me know if there is any issue about that plan and it needs some > adjustments. > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github > <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> > > > Le jeu. 22 nov. 2018 à 11:57, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> a écrit : > > There are several discussions about safeguard so i'd like we try to > get a dedicated thread about it and see how we move forward this lib. > > Personally I'd like to align it on the way other impls are done > which concretely means: > > 1. drop failsafe > 2. probably drop the API module which mainly adds builders and > definition models to make it part of the implementation and stick to > the spec in terms of exposed API > 3. merge tck module in the implementation module > 4. probably make FailsafeExecutionManager a cdi bean (we can keep it > usable programmatically if needed too, this is not one or the other) > to let the nested components be injected and overridable one by one > instead of having to override them all > 5. try to respect CDI model and not use reflections in interceptors > (drop AnnotationUtil), this is likely the hardest since the spec > does not enables it directly but we did with quite some success in > other specs > > I did a quick check and once 2 is done the effort for 1 is very > doable and 3/4 are quite trivial > > Wdyt? > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github > <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > > <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré [email protected] http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
