Was it related to this fix?
https://github.com/eclipse/microprofile-fault-tolerance/issues/323
Cheers
Bruno Baptista
https://twitter.com/brunobat_
On 18/12/18 12:53, Bruno Baptista wrote:
Hi Romain,
I have concerns about tweaking the test environment in order to pass
the TCK:
https://github.com/apache/geronimo-safeguard/blob/master/safeguard-impl/src/test/java/org/apache/safeguard/impl/tck/SafeguardTCKExtension.java#L80
Without that, we have these failures:
[ERROR] Failures:
[ERROR]
CircuitBreakerTest>Arquillian.run:138->testCircuitInitialSuccessDefaultSuccessThreshold:292
serviceA should throw an Exception in
testCircuitDefaultSuccessThreshold on iteration 5
[ERROR]
CircuitBreakerTest>Arquillian.run:138->testCircuitLateSuccessDefaultSuccessThreshold:370
in serviceA no CircuitBreakerOpenException should be fired on iteration 1
[INFO]
[ERROR] Tests run: 212, Failures: 2, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
You mention that the TCK leaks, can you provide further details on the
nature of the leak and how the TCK can be improved? I don't see a
filed issue regarding this problem.
Cheers
Bruno Baptista
https://twitter.com/brunobat_
On 18/12/18 09:42, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
Hi guys,
as mentionned here is the vote fore Geronimo Safeguard 1.2.0
The staging repo is:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1
<https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1073>075
My keys is still available in
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/KEYS
<http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/KEYS>
Tag is on the main source repo and sources in the staging repo.
This vote is open for 3 days as usual or untll it gets its 3 binding +1s.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
<https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
<https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
<https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
