Can you guys push your sample? On Wed, Mar 27, 2019, 4:58 PM Otávio Gonçalves de Santana < osant...@tomitribe.com> wrote:
> Hey Ivan. > I tried something, and I saw the same issue. It seems this by-pass does not > work. > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 11:18 AM Ivan Junckes Filho <ivanjunc...@gmail.com > > > wrote: > > > It didn't seem to work for me adding the property to system.properties. > Any > > ideas what I am doing wrong? > > > > On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 10:21 AM Roberto Cortez <radcor...@yahoo.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi Ivan, > > > > > > Yes Romain is right, you should set openejb.cxf-rs.cache-application = > > > false and it should work. We had to set that for the TCK to pass, but > the > > > config never reached the final distribution. I did notice that and I’ve > > > added it in case a MP app is detected, but it was after M2 was > released. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Roberto > > > > > > On 8 Feb 2019, at 21:06, Ivan Junckes Filho <ivanjunc...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > I will take a look thanks again Romain > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 4:38 PM Romain Manni-Bucau < > rmannibu...@gmail.com > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> Hey, just recalled we had a flag about it, > > >> > > >> you can skip it setting openejb.cxf-rs.cache-application=false > > >> > > >> Romain Manni-Bucau > > >> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > > >> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > > >> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > > >> https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > > >> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > > >> < > > >> > > > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> Le ven. 8 févr. 2019 à 19:01, Ivan Junckes Filho < > ivanjunc...@gmail.com > > > > > >> a > > >> écrit : > > >> > > >> > Interesting, ok thanks Romain. > > >> > > > >> > On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 3:29 PM Romain Manni-Bucau < > > >> rmannibu...@gmail.com> > > >> > wrote: > > >> > > > >> >> Hi Ivan, > > >> >> > > >> >> In a few cases - don't recall out of my head if it is all - TomEE > > wraps > > >> >> user application in InternalApplication. IIRC it was for caching > > >> reason - > > >> >> TomEE not being super cleanly aligned on CDI + to avoid to get > > multiple > > >> >> instances between runtime and deployment which can break user code. > > >> >> Enhancing TomEE to no do it anymore or not use a wrapper when not > > >> needed > > >> >> can be a first step fixing that. > > >> >> > > >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau > > >> >> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > > >> >> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > > >> >> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github > > >> >> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn > > >> >> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > > >> >> < > > >> > > > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > >> > > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> Le ven. 8 févr. 2019 à 18:14, Ivan Junckes Filho < > > >> ivanjunc...@gmail.com> > > >> >> a écrit : > > >> >> > > >> >>> The @OpenAPIDefinition is not being picked up by the CDI extension > > >> >>> because it is only getting InternalApplication instead of picking > up > > >> my > > >> >>> custom Application config. Any ideas why? OpenAPIDefinition > configs > > >> are > > >> >>> therefore not showing up in the openapi doc. > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> @OpenAPIDefinition(info = > > >> >>> @Info( > > >> >>> title = "TEST", > > >> >>> version = "2.0", > > >> >>> description = "Pet Store App API", > > >> >>> license = @License( > > >> >>> name = "Apache 2.0", > > >> >>> url = " > > >> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html"), > > >> >>> contact = @Contact( > > >> >>> name = "PetStore API Support", > > >> >>> url = " > > >> https://github.com/eclipse/microprofile-open-api", > > >> >>> email = "supp...@petstore.com") > > >> >>> ), > > >> >>> security = @SecurityRequirement(name = "oauth2"), > > >> >>> servers = @Server(url = "/test/")) > > >> >>> @ApplicationPath("/api") > > >> >>> @LoginConfig(authMethod = "MP-JWT") > > >> >>> public class ApplicationConfiguration extends Application { > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > > > > > > > >