Hi Romain,

yeah.. I can handle that.

Thank you!

Em ter., 4 de fev. de 2020 às 02:48, Romain Manni-Bucau <
[email protected]> escreveu:

> Hi Daniel,
>
> Thanks for the update.
> This is an iso-change, thought we were moving null handling to ConfigImpl
> rather than ConfigInjectionBean to enable it in Config.get[Optional]Value
> too (just requires an interval getRawValue for injection but nothing
> crazy), this is why i spoke about the constant in ConfigImpl and didnt
> expect Defaults class.
> Do you want to handle the ConfigImpl change? If not i can follow up.
>
> Le mar. 4 févr. 2020 à 02:58, Daniel Cunha <[email protected]> a
> écrit :
>
>> I had updated the PR:
>> https://github.com/apache/geronimo-config/pull/7/files
>> Hope it sounds good now.
>>
>> Em sáb., 1 de fev. de 2020 às 08:25, Daniel Cunha <[email protected]>
>> escreveu:
>>
>>> Hmm..
>>>
>>> Good catch! So, +1 to proceed with your strategy.
>>>
>>> Em sáb., 1 de fev. de 2020 às 07:39, Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>> [email protected]> escreveu:
>>>
>>>> Not really, half of the cases will be in databases or properties file
>>>> so the constant does not help.
>>>> Other half is in config property but if you use a spec you dont want to
>>>> depend directly on the impl so better to not expose it yet IMHO (it will be
>>>> fixed in the spec in 2.0 anyway).
>>>> That said ill not fight against a constant in ConfigImpl.
>>>>
>>>> Le sam. 1 févr. 2020 à 11:04, Daniel Cunha <[email protected]> a
>>>> écrit :
>>>>
>>>>> Ok, I get it.
>>>>>
>>>>> But the user should define that value in the ConfigProperty. I mean
>>>>> that with the constant it keep more fancy/easy/safe to the user. The
>>>>> constant is just a simplify way to not need to memorize the property like:
>>>>> org.apache.geronimo.config.value.NULL.
>>>>> It's better to use Constants.NULL_VALUE instead of set
>>>>> org.apache.geronimo.config.value.NULL in the ConfigProperty. IMHO.
>>>>>
>>>>> Em sáb., 1 de fev. de 2020 às 06:38, Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>> [email protected]> escreveu:
>>>>>
>>>>>> The only location we need that constant is there:
>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/geronimo-config/blob/trunk/impl/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/config/ConfigImpl.java#L135
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Something like return
>>>>>> "org.apache.geronimo.config.value.NULL".equals(value) ? null : value;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We also don't want the users to import
>>>>>> org.apache.geronimo.config.value.Constants in their code so not sure a
>>>>>> constant or enum is needed, was just that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
>>>>>> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
>>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
>>>>>> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Le sam. 1 févr. 2020 à 10:34, Daniel Cunha <[email protected]> a
>>>>>> écrit :
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Not sure if I get your point and applicability of it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Em sáb., 1 de fev. de 2020 às 04:49, Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>> [email protected]> escreveu:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Normally it should be used in a single place in ConfigImpl - dont
>>>>>>>> think we want users to see it, g-config should stay in scope runtime in
>>>>>>>> projects - so hardcoding it is ok and simpler to read but not a big 
>>>>>>>> deal if
>>>>>>>> it is a constant.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Le sam. 1 févr. 2020 à 04:27, Daniel Cunha <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hey,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I saw your comment on my PR.
>>>>>>>>> So, I like the idea to keep it as you mentioned, maybe we can move
>>>>>>>>> it for an Interface with some constants or better an Enum.
>>>>>>>>> So we can keep the NULL_VALUES still on the game in Geronimo,
>>>>>>>>> since it was removed in 1.4-RC3. :)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So, if the spec choose to continue with a strategy like
>>>>>>>>> NULL_VALUES we'll continue support spec and our implementation as 
>>>>>>>>> well.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Em sex., 31 de jan. de 2020 às 23:18, Daniel Cunha <
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> escreveu:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Sounds good. I'll update the PR for it. :)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Daniel "soro" Cunha
>>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 31, 2020, 18:35 Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Guess we can just use a custom geronimo constant and keep the
>>>>>>>>>>> feature. It is needed in a lot of apps anyway and we dont need to 
>>>>>>>>>>> break it
>>>>>>>>>>> in mpconfig 2 when the spec will have another solution.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> We should also wire it in Config to be able to reset a value
>>>>>>>>>>> (using source ordinals).
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Wdyt?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Le ven. 31 janv. 2020 à 22:26, Daniel Cunha <
>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Folks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Changes for MicroProfile Config 1.4-RC3. PR:
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/geronimo-config/pull/7
>>>>>>>>>>>> The NULL_VALUE was reverted. TCK and our tests is passing as
>>>>>>>>>>>> expected. :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regard
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Em dom., 26 de jan. de 2020 às 17:20, Mark Struberg <
>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> escreveu:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> lgtm,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Daniel and also Romain!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> LieGrue,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> strub
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Am 26.01.2020 um 16:22 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > FYI I just fixed master code - test was using the proxy
>>>>>>>>>>>>> fields instead of injected values. Feel free to review and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> enhance if
>>>>>>>>>>>>> needed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > @rmannibucau |  Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Le dim. 26 janv. 2020 à 08:28, Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Merged, thks a lot Daniel
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Le dim. 26 janv. 2020 à 01:25, Daniel Cunha <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > I believe now it's in a good shape.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Thank you, Romain.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Daniel "soro" Cunha
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > On Sat, Jan 25, 2020, 17:55 Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > You dont need to parse constants :
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Long.parseLong("0") -> 0L ;)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Otherwise looks perfect for me
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > If nobody shouts, i will merge it tmr or on monday
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Le sam. 25 janv. 2020 à 20:10, Daniel Cunha <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Changes sent!
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Thank you for your review Romain.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Em sáb., 25 de jan. de 2020 às 15:05, Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> escreveu:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Proxy supports primitives so default is not always null
>>>>>>>>>>>>> compared to injections, no? Once this point materialized by a 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> test - and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> maybe imports reorganized to minimize the diff? - i guess we are 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> good to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> merge.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Le sam. 25 janv. 2020 à 18:37, Daniel Cunha <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > I updated the PR. Hope it is in a good shape now!
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Thank you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Em sáb., 25 de jan. de 2020 às 13:08, Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> escreveu:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Except a small import issue (*) i guess it just needs the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> proxy handling (in our invocation handler)of default value and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> some test(s)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> then it looks pretty good to me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Le sam. 25 janv. 2020 à 17:01, Daniel Cunha <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Hi Folks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > https://github.com/apache/geronimo-config/pull/6
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > That is the PR with changes to cover MicroProfile 1.4-RC on
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Geronimo Config.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > I really appreciate if someone could put the eyes on it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Thank you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Daniel "soro" Cunha
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Daniel "soro" Cunha
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Daniel "soro" Cunha
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Daniel "soro" Cunha
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Daniel "soro" Cunha
>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Daniel "soro" Cunha
>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Daniel "soro" Cunha
>>>>> https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Daniel "soro" Cunha
>>> https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Daniel "soro" Cunha
>> https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>>
>

-- 
Daniel "soro" Cunha
https://twitter.com/dvlc_

Reply via email to