No problem, I don't care so much about the name too ;) regards,
François fpa...@apache.org Le 22/09/2020 à 20:01, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > Hmm, both are not linked this way (more the opposite ;)). > Why not kat (cat for kubernetes, read somewhere everybody loves cats)? ;) > > Btw i dont care much of the name while it can last but Id like some > other opinion if possible (even negative) - otherwise it can be done > at github ;). > > Le mar. 22 sept. 2020 à 19:34, Francois Papon > <francois.pa...@openobject.fr <mailto:francois.pa...@openobject.fr>> a > écrit : > > May be we can call it "excalibur" as we already have "arthur" :) > > regards, > > François > fpa...@apache.org <mailto:fpa...@apache.org> > > Le 21/09/2020 à 21:05, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : >> Up, any issue to create a geronimo-stack (happy to get a better >> name) project? >> >> >> Le lun. 10 août 2020 à 08:47, Romain Manni-Bucau >> <rmannibu...@gmail.com <mailto:rmannibu...@gmail.com>> a écrit : >> >> Small up, guess it is still holidays so will wait for a few >> more weeks to try to get more feedbacks before doing anything. >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github >> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn >> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book >> >> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> >> >> >> Le ven. 31 juil. 2020 à 09:16, Romain Manni-Bucau >> <rmannibu...@gmail.com <mailto:rmannibu...@gmail.com>> a écrit : >> >> Makes sense, thanks François >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github >> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn >> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book >> >> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> >> >> >> Le ven. 31 juil. 2020 à 09:15, Francois Papon >> <francois.pa...@openobject.fr >> <mailto:francois.pa...@openobject.fr>> a écrit : >> >> Hi Romain, >> >> I think the config spec is interesting and could be >> add to the list. >> >> regards, >> >> François >> fpa...@apache.org <mailto:fpa...@apache.org> >> >> Le 31/07/2020 à 08:34, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> After some years of MP I think it is not a safe >>> enough technology for long term applications - i.e. >>> maintained and evolved, not just developed for 6 months. >>> The main drawback is that it changes and breaks too >>> often and from my understanding it is not likely >>> about to change (what I understood is it will likely >>> be worse and can even import vendor/library API in >>> the spec API as it had been done for tracing one). >>> >>> The most common requirements are, IMHO: >>> >>> 1. health >>> 2. metrics (gauge+counter+openmetrics exporter, >>> others are fancy things) >>> 3. tracing >>> >>> maybe jwt-auth even if less sure. >>> >>> Therefore I wonder if we want to fork our own MP >>> impl to provide these 3 specs simplified versions >>> with a stable API. >>> I envision a single repo with the 3 api/impl. >>> >>> wdyt? >>> >>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | >>> Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github >>> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn >>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book >>> >>> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> >>
