+1 Same feedback, I'd go for a final. There is no work remaining as far as I can tell
Le dim. 15 mai 2022 à 09:03, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> a écrit : > Hi > > If we are confident to match javax/jakarta namespace change why not doing > a final? Errors/missing features could go in bugs. > Issue with milestones is the tooling support and proposed updates vs > version policies so if we can avoid it I would be for it but not sure if I > missed sthg. > > Le dim. 15 mai 2022 à 07:29, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> a > écrit : > >> +1 (binding) >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> On Sat, May 14, 2022 at 11:00 PM David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > Hey All, >> > >> > We're thinking to do a release on the TomEE side and this is one of the >> snapshot dependencies we have. I've prepped a 2.0.0-M1 with the idea that >> being a milestone it should be fairly non-controversial to propose without >> a heads up and I haven't checked the TCK status. I know we're not yet >> actively running the signature tests on the TomEE side. >> > >> > I propose we release 2.0.0-M1 so we have some non-snapshots to work >> with and come back to 2.0.0 as things look 100% on all fronts >> > >> > Staging Maven repository: >> > >> > - >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1153/ >> > >> > The only change is conversion from javax to the jakarta namespace via >> contributor Richard Zowalla. >> > >> > >> > Please vote to approve this release: >> > [ ] +1 Approve the release >> > [ ] 0 Abstain (please provide specific comments) >> > [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments) >> > >> > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >> > >> > -David >> > >> > -- Jean-Louis
