Agree, I also think we can drop all our extensions "components" since the reusability was never reached (it is always faster and simpler to implement your component) so let's keep only jbatch and UI/tools related modules maybe?
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> Le mar. 25 avr. 2023 à 08:52, Richard Zowalla <rich...@zowalla.com> a écrit : > Hi, > > aside from the upgrade killing our active waiting strategy in the tests > for the DirectEndpoint, I am seeing > > Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: > javax.activation.DataHandler > at > java.base/jdk.internal.loader.BuiltinClassLoader.loadClass(BuiltinClass > Loader.java:641) > at > java.base/jdk.internal.loader.ClassLoaders$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Cla > ssLoaders.java:188) > at > java.base/java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:520) > ... 82 more > > with the 2.25.x version of camel during the tests (if I workaround the > protected getConsumer() via a wrapper strategy, see [1]). However, the > tests will pass... > > This gives me the impression, that Camel 2.x isn't jakarta ready. From > looking into their Jira it seems, that Camel 4.x will be jakarta ready > (Java 17 as baseline) but for now upgrading would make it rather > useless (or we would need to relocate). > > Gruß > Richard > > [1] > > https://github.com/rzo1/geronimo-batchee/commit/6cc27362b7a0bb34a8bd3d39a1fe35c4a5f834b3 > > > > Am Freitag, dem 21.04.2023 um 13:13 +0200 schrieb Mark Struberg via > dev: > > Hi folks! > > > > I've now finished the work on BatchEE-2.0.0. > > I think we have to enable the TCK still, but all our internal tests > > do work again. > > > > Note that I had to move back to an old Camel version due to getting > > test errors with a newer version. > > Would be great if someone could please take a look at it! > > > > LieGrue, > > strub > >
