Hi all,

Closing this vote (yes, more than overdue).
With my +1 (binding), we've got so far

- Romain: -0 (binding)
- Francois Papon, Jean-Louis Monteiro, Mark Struberg, Jean-Baptiste: 4 +1
(binding)
- Richard Zowalla, Jonathan Gallimore, Daniel Dias Dos Santos: 3 +1 (non
binding)

Vote passes. I'll proceed with the release.

Best regards



Le lun. 10 juin 2024 à 16:03, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <jeano...@gmail.com> a
écrit :

> Hi everyone,
>
> I fixed 2 bugs and realized we were still in milestone mode. So it's more
> than overdue. Here is a vote for the final 1.0.0 of the Jakarta Mail spec
> 2.1
>
> *SVN Tag*
>
> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec-1.0.0/
>
> *Staging repo*
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1170
>
> *Sources*
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1170/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec/1.0.0/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec-1.0.0-source-release.zip
>
> *Dist*
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/specs/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec-1.0.0/
>
> *The release notes are *
> Bug
>
>    - [GERONIMO-6869 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6869>]
>    - InternetAddress.toString(InternetAddress[] addresses) prints the same
>    address
>    - [GERONIMO-6870 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6870>]
>    - RFC822 violation with duplicated headers
>
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary number
> of votes are reached.
>
> Please vote accordingly:
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> --
> Jean-Louis
>


-- 
Jean-Louis

Reply via email to