+1, thanks

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://x.com/rmannibucau> | .NET Blog
<https://dotnetbirdie.github.io/> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.github.io/> | Old
Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
<https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
<https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
<https://www.packtpub.com/en-us/product/java-ee-8-high-performance-9781788473064>
Javaccino founder (Java/.NET service - contact via linkedin)


Le mar. 21 juil. 2026 à 21:10, Markus Jung <[email protected]> a écrit :

> Key looks good now, so +1 (non binding) from me
>
> > On 21. Jul 2026, at 16:45, Francois Papon <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > It's ok now, the key has been add.
> >
> > François
> > [email protected]
> > [email protected]
> >
> > Le 21/07/2026 à 13:10, Markus Jung a écrit :
> >> -1 for now, the key is not the one in
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/geronimo/KEYS
> >>
> >> should be an easy fix though for any PMC member ;)
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> Markus
> >>
> >> On 7/21/26 11:35, Richard Zowalla wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> As discussed on the other mail thread and Slack, I act as a release
> manager this time although I am not part of the PMC.
> >>> The final steps after a potential successful vote need to be done by a
> PMC member.
> >>>
> >>> Nevertheless, I would like to call a vote on releasing Apache Geronimo
> Mail 1.1.0 - our implementation of the Jakarta Mail 2.1 specification.
> >>>
> >>> Notable changes in this release:
> >>>        • [GERONIMO-6834] - geronimo-jakartamail_2.1_spec (1.0.0-M1)
> does not pass Jakarta Mail TCK SigTests for Java 11
> >>>      • [GERONIMO-6884] - Jakarta mail behaves different from
> eclipse.angus
> >>>      • [GERONIMO-6851] - The implementation for
> mail.mime.parameters.strict parameter is missing in
> jakarta\mail\internet\ParameterList.java class of
> geronimo-mail_2.1_spec-1.0.0-M1.jar in TomEE 9.1.0
> >>>      • [GERONIMO-6835] - Fix Jakarta Mail TCK 2.0.1 for Geronimo
> Jakarta Mail Impl
> >>>      • [GERONIMO-6885] - Setup Mail TCK
> >>>      • [GERONIMO-6886] - Ensure to flush the buffered output stream
> introduced in GERONIMO-6882
> >>>      • [GERONIMO-6887] - Include the relocated mime4j classes in the
> geronimo-mail_2.1_mail bundle
> >>>      • [GERONIMO-6888] - Migrate to JUnit 5
> >>>      • [GERONIMO-6889] - Upgrade to apache-mime4j-core 0.8.14
> >>>      • [GERONIMO-6890] - Raise build target to Java 11 of Geronimo Mail
> >>>      • [GERONIMO-6891] - Fix IMAPFolder.renameTo reporting failure
> after a successful rename
> >>>      • [GERONIMO-6892] - IMAP APPEND used to deadlock because the
> client never flushes the literal announcement
> >>>      • [GERONIMO-6893] - MessageCountListeners are never notified -
> Folder queues MessageCountEvents to the MessageChangedListener list
> >>>      • [GERONIMO-6894] - Flags.retainAll adds flags from the argument
> and removes user flags despite Flags.Flag.USER
> >>>      • [GERONIMO-6895] - Folder.fetch() fails on RFC-strict servers -
> header names emitted outside the BODY.PEEK[HEADER.FIELDS] section brackets
> >>>      • [GERONIMO-6896] - getContentLanguage() throws NPE for IMAP
> messages whose BODYSTRUCTURE has no language field
> >>>      • [GERONIMO-6897] - Folder.create() sends the uninitialized
> hierarchy separator, creating a mailbox named "name\0"
> >>>      • [GERONIMO-6898] - store.getDefaultFolder().list() returns empty
> when the server hierarchy delimiter is not '/'
> >>>      • [GERONIMO-6899] - Single-message Message.setFlags() never fires
> MessageChangedEvent
> >>>      • [GERONIMO-6900] - Folder.close(false) loses \Deleted messages -
> use UNSELECT when the server supports RFC 3691
> >>>      • [GERONIMO-6901] - Failed Folder.open() leaks the pooled
> connection, breaks Store.close() and hides FolderNotFoundException
> >>>      • [GERONIMO-6902] - Folder.expunge() always returns an empty
> array - EXPUNGE responses extracted under the wrong keyword
> >>>      • [GERONIMO-6903] - IMAP response parser drops the byte following
> a bare CR, corrupting the stream
> >>>      • [GERONIMO-6904] - A garbled IMAP response leaves the connection
> poolable and poisons later commands
> >>>      • [GERONIMO-6905] - IMAP response codes in brackets
> (PERMANENTFLAGS, UIDVALIDITY, UIDNEXT, UNSEEN) are never parsed
> >>>      • [GERONIMO-6906] - Spec is missing the Jakarta Mail 2.1 API
> additions
> >>>      • [GERONIMO-6907] - MIME handling deviates from the Jakarta Mail
> 2.1 spec
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Source release (with .asc and .sha512):
> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/javamail/1.1.0/
> >>>
> >>> Maven staging repository:
> >>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1182/
> >>>
> >>> Git tag:
> >>>
> https://github.com/apache/geronimo-mail/releases/tag/geronimo-mail_2.1_parent-1.1.0
> >>> 62b24797c538e90a3854d31b2562cee2333a8a3e
> >>>
> >>> Release verification: the build is green on JDK 21 and the full Jakarta
> >>> Mail 2.1 TCK passes (321/321) against these artifacts.
> >>>
> >>> KEYS file:
> >>> https://downloads.apache.org/geronimo/KEYS
> >>>
> >>> Please review and vote. The vote is open for at least 72 hours.
> >>>
> >>> [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
> >>> [ ] +0 No opinion
> >>> [ ] -1 Do not release, because ...
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Richard
> >>>
>
>

Reply via email to