Hi, any chance to include GIRAPH-42 (so sent-messages counter > 0)? Thanks, Doron
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 2:05 AM, Avery Ching <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree with this. No showstoppers. The next version will have a ton of > improvements though. Would be really nice to have GIRAPH-388 in though as > it has a large performance impact. > > Avery > > > On 10/26/12 2:48 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > >> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Eli Reisman <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> I can say from the list you have, GIRAPH-260 and GIRAPH-263 are not >>> blockers as far as I can see. Some of the other JIRA issues on the list >>> might be easily resolved one way or the other as well at this point. I >>> think both can safely be resolved at this point (260 can be a "won't >>> fix", >>> and 263 "fixed" as far as i can tell?) >>> >> Can we make a call on them one way or another? That would be helpful. >> Personally, I'm going to triage a couple of the ones I had in there: >> >> https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/GIRAPH-198<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-198> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/GIRAPH-199<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-199> >> >> At this point it looks as though we don't really have any showstoppers >> for 0.2. At this point I'd like to proceed with a branch creation, RCs >> and testing via Bigtop and other means on my side of things. Will >> report accordingly. >> >> Thanks, >> Roman. >> > >
