[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-494?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13567771#comment-13567771
]
Nitay Joffe commented on GIRAPH-494:
------------------------------------
My bad, I put in java.util.Objects (from java 1.7) instead of guava Objects.
Fix coming.
> Edge should be an interface
> ---------------------------
>
> Key: GIRAPH-494
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-494
> Project: Giraph
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Nitay Joffe
> Assignee: Nitay Joffe
> Attachments: GIRAPH-494.patch
>
>
> In terms of architecture and for flexibility I think our Edge class should be
> an interface instead of a real class. In this diff I change it to an
> interface and add a sub interface called MutableEdge. The existing Edge class
> is now called DefaultEdge. Note that only one class in our codebase actually
> needs a MutableEdge - RepresentativeVertex. Everything else works perfectly
> fine using the immutable Edge interface.
> One nice thing this allowed me to do is to create a EdgeNoValue which we can
> use for algorithms whose edges have no value at all. Currently the same
> functionality is achieved by using NullWritable, however using EdgeNoValue
> means not storing a reference to the single NullWritable instance in every
> single edge. Working on a job that reads 1B+ edges per worker, a pointer per
> edge adds up.
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/9172/
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
