-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10343/#review18791
-----------------------------------------------------------


Weighted PageRank doesn't seem particularly significant in the literature. I'd 
rather keep just one (standard) PageRankBenchmark.
Also, why would it hurt to keep the current options? We can still use the 
benchmark to test vertex/edge input, edge locality, and different VertexEdges 
implementations, as long as the defaults are the fastest.
Edge locality especially seems something we should keep in the benchmark, since 
it can show how Giraph behaves with smartly-partitioned data.

- Alessandro Presta


On April 8, 2013, 6:23 p.m., Maja Kabiljo wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/10343/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 8, 2013, 6:23 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for giraph.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Make two benchmarks for page rank:
> - WeightedPageRankBenchmark which corresponds to current PageRankBenchmark 
> (has all the options for testing different stuff), changed the vertex 
> implementation to use the weights of the edges in the computation
> - FastPageRankBenchmark, which we can use to show how fast Giraph really is 
> :-) It uses integers for vertex ids, floats for page ranks, it's unweighted 
> and doesn't have all the options from PageRankBenchmark, but just the basic 
> stuff
> 
> 
> This addresses bug giraph-543.
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/giraph-543
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> giraph-core/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/benchmark/FastPageRankBenchmark.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> giraph-core/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/benchmark/FastPageRankVertex.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   
> giraph-core/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/benchmark/PageRankBenchmark.java 
> fbb2516 
>   giraph-core/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/benchmark/PageRankVertex.java 
> 3f394b4 
>   
> giraph-core/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/benchmark/WeightedPageRankBenchmark.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> giraph-core/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/benchmark/WeightedPageRankVertex.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   giraph-core/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/combiner/FloatSumCombiner.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   giraph-core/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/edge/IntNullArrayEdges.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   
> giraph-core/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/io/formats/PseudoRandomEdgeInputFormat.java
>  87cadb4 
>   
> giraph-core/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/io/formats/PseudoRandomIntNullVertexInputFormat.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> giraph-core/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/io/formats/PseudoRandomUtils.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   
> giraph-core/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/io/formats/PseudoRandomVertexInputFormat.java
>  dca0271 
>   giraph-core/src/test/java/org/apache/giraph/io/TestJsonBase64Format.java 
> 0117ce9 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10343/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Maja Kabiljo
> 
>

Reply via email to