-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12559/#review23172
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


+1, this is awesome, much better than hacky/incoreect GIRAPH-694.

- Avery Ching


On July 15, 2013, 8:56 p.m., Maja Kabiljo wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/12559/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 15, 2013, 8:56 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for giraph.
> 
> 
> Bugs: GIRAPH-716
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-716
> 
> 
> Repository: giraph-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> It seems GIRAPH-694 wasn't enough, since we got similar problems again. We 
> should not modify Configurations, but create copies when we need them. There 
> were some issues in hive-io which prevented us from doing this in the first 
> place, which are fixed now.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   giraph-core/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/conf/GiraphConfiguration.java 
> 74f1ba5 
>   
> giraph-core/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/io/internal/WrappedEdgeInputFormat.java
>  c3adf4c 
>   
> giraph-core/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/io/internal/WrappedEdgeReader.java
>  e3b3689 
>   
> giraph-core/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/io/internal/WrappedVertexInputFormat.java
>  a58a32d 
>   
> giraph-core/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/io/internal/WrappedVertexOutputFormat.java
>  bffa330 
>   
> giraph-core/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/io/internal/WrappedVertexReader.java
>  bf0a212 
>   giraph-core/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/job/HadoopUtils.java d5095bc 
>   pom.xml 7a79aed 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12559/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Passes 'mvn clean verify' (also with hadoop_2.0.0 profile). Passed real job 
> on the cluster with both hive-io and hcatalog.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Maja Kabiljo
> 
>

Reply via email to