[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GOBBLIN-1926?focusedWorklogId=884367&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-884367
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot logged work on GOBBLIN-1926:
-------------------------------------------

                Author: ASF GitHub Bot
            Created on: 10/Oct/23 20:23
            Start Date: 10/Oct/23 20:23
    Worklog Time Spent: 10m 
      Work Description: codecov-commenter commented on PR #3797:
URL: https://github.com/apache/gobblin/pull/3797#issuecomment-1756167876

   ## 
[Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/gobblin/pull/3797?src=pr&el=h1&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache)
 Report
   > Merging 
[#3797](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/gobblin/pull/3797?src=pr&el=desc&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache)
 (af663be) into 
[master](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/gobblin/commit/e4cae2e3c559691f8b8873f81ab805c8a6482fd2?el=desc&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache)
 (e4cae2e) will **decrease** coverage by `1.19%`.
   > The diff coverage is `n/a`.
   
   ```diff
   @@             Coverage Diff              @@
   ##             master    #3797      +/-   ##
   ============================================
   - Coverage     47.33%   46.14%   -1.19%     
   + Complexity    10971     2181    -8790     
   ============================================
     Files          2152      416    -1736     
     Lines         85149    17965   -67184     
     Branches       9467     2191    -7276     
   ============================================
   - Hits          40302     8290   -32012     
   + Misses        41190     8792   -32398     
   + Partials       3657      883    -2774     
   ```
   
   
   [see 1740 files with indirect coverage 
changes](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/gobblin/pull/3797/indirect-changes?src=pr&el=tree-more&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache)
   
   :mega: We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD 
build times. [Learn 
more](https://about.codecov.io/iterative-testing/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache)
   




Issue Time Tracking
-------------------

    Worklog Id:     (was: 884367)
    Time Spent: 20m  (was: 10m)

> Reminder event lease acquisition epsilon comparison fix
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GOBBLIN-1926
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GOBBLIN-1926
>             Project: Apache Gobblin
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: gobblin-service
>            Reporter: Urmi Mustafi
>            Assignee: Abhishek Tiwari
>            Priority: Major
>          Time Spent: 20m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> For a large number of reminder events, we are still seeing the event be 
> considered distinct and launching a separate execution. Analysis of the 
> reminder events being considered unique shows that reminder eventTimestamps 
> that are well in the past are handled properly by this 
> [case|https://github.com/apache/gobblin/blob/e4cae2e3c559691f8b8873f81ab805c8a6482fd2/gobblin-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/gobblin/runtime/api/MysqlMultiActiveLeaseArbiter.java#L296].
>  However, a large number of reminder events fall into the case of being 
> exactly equal to the timestamp in the database. Those are handled improperly 
> by falling into [CASE 
> 6|https://github.com/apache/gobblin/blob/e4cae2e3c559691f8b8873f81ab805c8a6482fd2/gobblin-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/gobblin/runtime/api/MysqlMultiActiveLeaseArbiter.java#L347]
>  of the same event time lease completed yet we were considering the reminder 
> event to be unique. This is because we were comparing the _current timestamp_ 
> in the database to the _db event timestamp_ to determine uniqueness. However, 
> we always want to utilize the _event timestamp_ the reminder is for, since 
> _linger_ time will have passed and the event would be considered unique if 
> using the former check. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to