[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GOBBLIN-2062?focusedWorklogId=918397&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-918397
]
ASF GitHub Bot logged work on GOBBLIN-2062:
-------------------------------------------
Author: ASF GitHub Bot
Created on: 08/May/24 18:25
Start Date: 08/May/24 18:25
Worklog Time Spent: 10m
Work Description: phet commented on code in PR #3944:
URL: https://github.com/apache/gobblin/pull/3944#discussion_r1594463833
##########
gobblin-service/src/main/java/org/apache/gobblin/service/modules/orchestration/LeaseAttemptStatus.java:
##########
@@ -57,6 +58,8 @@ public static class NoLongerLeasingStatus extends
LeaseAttemptStatus {}
current LeaseObtainedStatus via the completeLease method from a caller
without access to the {@link MultiActiveLeaseArbiter}.
*/
@Data
+ // avoid - warning: Generating equals/hashCode implementation but without a
call to superclass, even though this class does not extend java.lang.Object
Review Comment:
warnings at least don't indicate that it's necessary over there and I
believe that's because warning arose since `LeaseObtainedStatus` and
`LeasedToAnotherStatus` are `@Data`, whereas `NoLongerLeasingStatus` is not.
since not `@Data`, lombok is not synthesizing `equals` for
`NoLongerLeasingStatus`
Issue Time Tracking
-------------------
Worklog Id: (was: 918397)
Time Spent: 4h 50m (was: 4h 40m)
> adhoc flow failure due to concurrent execs must be removed from flow catalog
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GOBBLIN-2062
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GOBBLIN-2062
> Project: Apache Gobblin
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: gobblin-service
> Reporter: Kip Kohn
> Assignee: Abhishek Tiwari
> Priority: Major
> Time Spent: 4h 50m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> the Orchestrator + DagManager MUST remove adhoc flows that violate concurrent
> execs from the flow catalog. otherwise gaas will continue to return '409
> Conflict' to each subsequent attempt to create an adhoc flow with the same
> flowGroup+flowName. this is despite the fact that the flow (which still
> remains in the FlowCatalog, when it shouldn't be) already has the status
> FAILED, which is a "final status".
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)