Thanks Hung for the update. I will review the release later today.
Abhishek
On 7/30/18, 5:53 PM, "Hung Tran" <hut...@linkedin.com> wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Gobblin 0.13.0 (Incubating).
The source release candidate RC0 can be downloaded here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/gobblin/apache-gobblin-incubating-0.13.0-rc0/
The artifacts (i.e. JARs) corresponding to this release candidate can be
found here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegobblin-1005/
This has been signed with PGP key 9BB772F1 corresponding to
hut...@apache.org, which is included in the repository's KEYS file.
This key can be found on keyservers, such as:
http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x<http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x234E3FE3><http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x234E3FE3>
9BB772F1
The release candidate has been tagged with release-0.13.0-rc0. I've also
created a branch 0.13.0.
For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 0.13.0:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12343492
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12343492>
For a summary of the changes in this release, see:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-gobblin/blob/0.13.0/CHANGELOG.md
Please review and vote. The vote will be open for 72 hours (ends on Monday,
2 August 2018, 5:52pm PDT).
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
My vote: +1
Note: Since there were no votes, I have repurposed RC0 to include the fix
to the launcher script from Tamas.
Thanks,
Hung.
________________________________
From: Abhishek Tiwari <a...@apache.org>
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2018 10:53:01 AM
To: dev@gobblin.incubator.apache.org; Tamas Nemeth
Cc: shirsha...@apache.org; ibuen...@apache.org; jbaran...@apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Gobblin 0.13.0 release RC0
Yes, we should fix it because its a launcher script, so although a minor
bug, its almost a show stopper.
I saw that you opened a PR for fix. So, Hung can we please include this in
the release?
Abhishek
On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 12:58 AM Tamas Nemeth <tamas.nem...@prezi.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can we update the specified dependencies in the bash scripts in bin?
> In the current form it, for example, thegobblin-mapreduce.sh will throw a
> class not found if you try to run as the dropwizard metrics was updated
>
<https://github.com/apache/incubator-gobblin/blob/33d4fea4b64f6e4c5f952eb2e1bd5286424f8e4d/gradle/scripts/computeVersions.gradle#L65>
but
> the in the bin/gobblin-mapreduce.sh points to an older version
>
<https://github.com/apache/incubator-gobblin/blob/33d4fea4b64f6e4c5f952eb2e1bd5286424f8e4d/bin/gobblin-mapreduce.sh#L175>
> .
>
> Thanks,
> Tamas
>
> On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 4:42 AM Hung Tran <hut...@linkedin.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Gobblin 0.13.0 (Incubating).
>>
>> The source release candidate RC0 can be downloaded here:
>>
>>
>>
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/gobblin/apache-gobblin-incubating-0.13.0-rc0/
>>
>> The artifacts (i.e. JARs) corresponding to this release candidate can be
>> found here:
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegobblin-1004/
>>
>> This has been signed with PGP key 9BB772F1 corresponding to
>> hut...@apache.org, which is included in the repository's KEYS file.
>>
>>
>> This key can be found on keyservers, such as:
>> http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x<
>> http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x234E3FE3><
>> http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x234E3FE3>
>>
>> 9BB772F1
>>
>> The release candidate has been tagged with release-0.13.0-rc0. I've also
>> created a branch 0.13.0. For reference, here is a list of all closed
JIRAs
>> tagged with 0.13.0:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12343492 For a summary of
>> the changes in this release, see:
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-gobblin/blob/0.13.0/CHANGELOG.md
>> Please review and vote. The vote will be open for 72 hours (ends on
Monday,
>> 30 July 2018, 7:30pm PDT). [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1
>> disapprove (and reason why) My vote: +1 Thanks, Hung.
>>
>>
>>
