Hi Henry, When I started on this my opinion changed somewhat The investment required is as follows
1) Maven (svnpubsub) I can grab the maven fluido skin [0] (which looks OK) and have it up and running reasonably shortly. 2) Apache CMS, this requires someone writing the site however the publishing workflow is so much less hassle. What do you think? Lewis [0] http://maven.apache.org/skins/maven-fluido-skin/ On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Henry Saputra <[email protected]> wrote: > Lewis, > > With Maven site, does it mean we are still using the svn pubsub or we could > move to ASF CMS for publishing it? > > - Henry > > > On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 3:47 AM, Lewis John Mcgibbney < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> I'm currently setting about the transition from Forrest to Maven for >> the site docs. >> It complicates things by having the "current" two tier structure which >> we maintain for the site docs. I therefore propose to just have docs. >> Enis, you had reasons and justification behind the legacy Gora >> documentation structure, if you could remind us again it would be >> excellent. >> I am working on this today regardless and will hopefully have a new >> proposal for the Mavenized site prepared shortly. >> >> Thanks, everyone. >> >> Happy St Andrews Day >> >> Lewis >> >> -- >> Lewis >> -- Lewis
