Hi Lewis,
2013/2/8 Lewis John Mcgibbney <[email protected]>: > Hi Alfonso, > > On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 2:46 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> Hi all, >> >> I updated GORA-174 issue info about HBase backend at [0]. Any thoughts? I >> think now is better expressed. >> > > This is much clearer for me at least. We are always going to have certain > problems (when developing Gora) when intricacies associated with (and which > affect all) datastores are encountered. GORA-174 is a perfect example. > There is no workaround and it is essential to have a thorough understanding > of the problem at individual "datastore level". Thanks for the > documentation, it is really driving this issue forward! +1 (: >> If no one think is wrong, I will implement solution-1 and solution-2(this >> means maybe quite work, so do we maintain it? -I vote yes). >> > > I think the proposed resolutions are certainly attractive and that we > should progress on this basis. When we get to a 1.0 Gora release (please > excuse my wishful long-term thinking) then we can act on completely > removing the deprecated methods from Gora, for the time being I see no > problem (and I certainly would back with my +1) methods being deprecated in > favour of more appropriate mechanisms for data persistence. > > I've been talking this issue through with Renato offline and glad to > observe that the HBase and Cassandra stuff seems to be coming along nicely. > > Is anyone in a position to address this with Accumulo? > What about DynamoDB? > Does DataFIle/AvroStore(s) support this in their current form? We probably should think on fixing this issue inside the AvroStorage first, but I think it would be wiser to also plan for upgrading Avro to 1.7 at some point after this. Renato M. > Thanks > Lewis
