Hey Scott,
Let me put it this way:
Employee {
name:..
......
boss: [null / Employee / string]
}
Each record represents a single employee along with all his/her details.
Field "boss" points to the boss of the current employee. There is at max
one boss for an employee.
Thanks,
Tejas
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Scott Stults <
[email protected]> wrote:
> Right, but aren't we looking for multiple Employees there? The way I
> interpret the original schema, a boss may only have a single Employee.
> Maybe I'm just not understanding the data model.
>
> -Scott
>
>
> On Aug 26, 2013, at 7:45 PM, Henry Saputra <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > I think the schema is a valid Union, so it allows null, or Employee, or
> > string for boss.
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 8:34 AM, Scott Stults <
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> Lewis,
> >>
> >> In your schema, should the type for boss be a union of null and an array
> >> of Employee?
> >>
> >>>
> >>> {"name": "boss", "type":["null","Employee","string"]},
> >>
> >>
> >> -Scott
>
>
