Thanks for driving the release, Lewis. +0 for me
Checksum files look good Signature file looks good LICENCE file looks good NOTICE file looks good Source compiled and pass tests. But looks like in the source artifact after I unzip from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/gora/ I saw extra files: GORA-262.patch and gora-267.diff Those files probably should not be there? - Henry - Henry On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Lewis John Mcgibbney <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Folks, > I am very happy to get a VOTE out for Apache Gora 0.6.1 Release Candidate. > > We solved 21 issues: http://s.apache.org/l69 > > Git source tag (79fba16dc9bf0b1660861a233a218bc669173178): > http://s.apache.org/gora-0.6.1 > > Staging repo: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegora-1003 > > Source Release Artifacts: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/gora/ > > PGP release keys (signed using 48BAEBF6 - Lewis John McGibbney): > http://gora.apache.org/dist/KEYS > > Vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > Thank you to everyone that is able to VOTE as well as everyone that > contributed to Apache Gora 0.6.1. > > [ ] +1, let's get it released!!! > [ ] +/-0, fine, but consider to fix few issues before... > [ ] -1, nope, because... (and please explain wh > > > P.S. Here is my +1 > > -- > Lewis
