Hi G. Ann, This is actually my fault and I should not have left the tests in this state. In the meantime I think that we should retain the testFailureIgnore boolean value as false as we want to know when something is broken.
I'll try and have a look into the failing tests this week. Thank you very much for dropping in. Great to hear that you guys are doing large scale source code analysis with such attention to detail. Lewis On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 6:21 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > Nemo SonarQube analysis of Gora > <http://nemo.sonarqube.org/dashboard/index/792699> has been failing since > 6 > Oct. on this: > > Results : > > Failed tests: > testGetWithFields(org.apache.gora.memory.store.MemStoreTest): > expected:<null> but was:<Random Joe> > > Tests in error: > > testMemStoreDeleteByQueryFields(org.apache.gora.memory.store.MemStoreTest) > > > Build fails in the Core module. > > Note that our SOP is to build with -Dmaven.test.failure.ignore=true. > However, the main pom sets <testFailureIgnore>false</testFailureIgnore> on > line 490, so these test failures must be resolved before we can analyze. > > > Help? > Ann > > > --- > *G. Ann CAMPBELL* | SonarSource > Product Owner > http://sonarsource.com > > -- *Lewis*
