We need to change same in project's readme.md.


On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 12:40 AM, Edward Capriolo <[email protected]>
wrote:

> You might be looking at the wrong project:
>
> https://github.com/edwardcapriolo/incubator-gossip/blob/master/pom.xml
>
>
>    <parent>
>                 <groupId>org.apache</groupId>
>                 <artifactId>apache</artifactId>
>                 <version>RELEASE</version>
>         </parent>
>
>         <groupId>org.apache.gossip</groupId>
>         <artifactId>gossip</artifactId>
>         <name>gossip</name>
>
> A few people seem to be confused because the pre-fork code is also in my
> github.
>
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 2:55 PM, P. Taylor Goetz <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I would change the groupId to org.apache.gossip. I’d have to check, but I
> > think Nexus has rules in place that enforce that, so it’s probably best
> to
> > just go ahead.
> >
> > -Taylor
> >
> > > On Oct 7, 2016, at 2:52 PM, chandresh pancholi <
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > +1 for release.
> > >
> > > Concern
> > > Right now groupId on github says io.teknek. Will it change to
> > > org.apache.gossip in first release?
> > > If it changes then we have to remove io.teknek from readme.md
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 11:55 PM, P. Taylor Goetz <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> The typical process is to have a DISCUSS thread before and official
> VOTE
> > >> thread, but I assume that was the intent here.
> > >>
> > >> I’m +1 for moving forward with a release. Here are some links to some
> > >> light reading about the process [1][2].
> > >>
> > >> A quick check of the gossip repo reveals the following that need to be
> > >> addressed before release:
> > >>
> > >> - DISCLAIMER file needs to be added.
> > >> - NOTICE file needs to added (see [3] for the procedure)
> > >> - KEYS file needs to be created (see [4] for more light reading on
> > signing
> > >> releases)
> > >>
> > >> The release manager will also need an account on
> repository.apache.org
> > (ASF’s
> > >> Nexus instance).
> > >>
> > >> It would also be good, but not required, for the signing key to be
> > linked
> > >> to the Apache web of trust.
> > >>
> > >> Edward, can I assume you are going to be the release manager for the
> > first
> > >> release?  If you need any help, feel free to ask.
> > >>
> > >> -Taylor
> > >>
> > >> [1] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html
> > >> [2] http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.
> > html#Releases
> > >> [3] http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice
> > >> [4] http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Oct 7, 2016, at 3:26 AM, Edward Capriolo <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> With the additions of:
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GOSSIP-21
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GOSSIP-26
> > >>
> > >> Apache Gossip has the the ability to create peer to peer systems and
> > share
> > >> user defined data between them. Those capabilities prompts me to call
> a
> > >> vote for the first release of Apache Gossip.
> > >>
> > >> The current pom tag is 0.1.0-incubating so I think we should call the
> > >> release version 0.2.0-incubating.
> > >>
> > >> My vote  +1 (binding).
> > >>
> > >> Thank you,
> > >> Edward
> > >>
> > >> (Thank you mentors for good nudging :)
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Chandresh Pancholi
> > > Senior Software Engineer
> > > Flipkart.com
> > > Email-id:[email protected]
> > > Contact:08951803660
> >
> >
>



-- 
Chandresh Pancholi
Senior Software Engineer
Flipkart.com
Email-id:[email protected]
Contact:08951803660

Reply via email to