On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Hans Dockter <[email protected]> wrote:
> I don't think so. With such a 'large' build structure you can figure out > with the pre-commit build if you have broken something in projects that > depend on your teams project. Google for example pushes this to the extreme > by having only one source root. Ok, so we have 3000 developers making let's say 10,000 commits per day in total. Having 10,000 full builds won't work (well, maybe Google can spare that much machines, but if we (investment bank) can't, I doubt few others can), and having a few builds with all those commits would also mean that my work won't committed because one of my upstream dependencies didn't compile. Sorry, I can't see the benefit. Total blocking of commit progress (oh, maybe that is why it can work, each person only commit once a month, but that kills team work then)... I don't buy it. Cheers -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java I live here; http://tinyurl.com/3xugrbk I work here; http://tinyurl.com/24svnvk I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
