Would that also be a step toward aggregate builds?

On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 15:53, Adam Murdoch <[email protected]>wrote:

>
> If we had a little more time available, I'd change Project.childProjects,
> subprojects and allprojects into DomainObjectCollections, and add a
> Project.childProjects.add() method. This would be the first step in getting
> rid of settings.gradle.
>
>
> On 30/09/2011, at 3:21 AM, Szczepan Faber wrote:
>
> >Only that we have to be careful about what we expose publicly.
>
> Ok. So it's a method that creates a child project.
>
> Cheers!
>
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Luke Daley <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>>
>> On 29/09/2011, at 5:26 PM, Szczepan Faber wrote:
>>
>> I'm planning to move HelperUtil.createChildProject into the
>> ProjectBuilder. This way other projects can do some more interesting testing
>> :)
>>
>> Let me know if you have any objections.
>>
>>
>> Only that we have to be careful about what we expose publicly.
>>
>> --
>> Luke Daley
>> Principal Engineer, Gradleware
>> http://gradleware.com
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Szczepan Faber
> Principal engineer@gradleware
> Lead@mockito
>
>
>
> --
> Adam Murdoch
> Gradle Co-founder
> http://www.gradle.org
> VP of Engineering, Gradleware Inc. - Gradle Training, Support, Consulting
> http://www.gradleware.com
>
>


-- 
Jason Porter
http://lightguard-jp.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/lightguardjp

Software Engineer
Open Source Advocate
Author of Seam Catch - Next Generation Java Exception Handling

PGP key id: 926CCFF5
PGP key available at: keyserver.net, pgp.mit.edu

Reply via email to