On 5 February 2013 04:03, Luke Daley <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 04/02/2013, at 5:56 PM, Szczepan Faber <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>
>> Coersion of file for a task is pretty cool, yet the workaround is
>> fairly cheap.
>
> The cost is higher than you might think.
>
> 1. It hurts docs because you are forced to read the prose to understand the 
> types
> 2. When there's a type coercion failure, the error message is rather vague
> 3. It's type specific, and there are nuances to dealing with different types
>
> In short, even if solving this does nothing about the problems with 
> convention mapping it's still worth it.
>
>> I think that the biggest gain from this story might
>> actually be kick starting a tidy-up in the convention mapping
>> business. So there you go, I think that that it's finally time to
>> start dealing with convention mappings :)
>
> This would be my preference as well.
>
>> Backwards compatibility for convention mappings is pretty tricky. On
>> one hand, this feature was advertised as internal in past so
>> theoretically, we can change it. However, the change might affect
>> users that don't use the CMs at all, some users might just happen to
>> consume some 3rd party plugin that uses CMs. I guess that's true for
>> any kind of breaking change. Yet, I think that there's fair amount of
>> 3rd party plugins that were inspired on Gradle codebase and hence use
>> CMs. I'd say that we should have generous migration plan for any
>> changes in CMs, ideally, we're just fully compatible :)
>
> If we introduce a type coercion layer into our MOP that supports deferred 
> values, we might be able to make the existing convention mapping API simply 
> delegate to this. With the impl I'm planning this will be possible I think.

At the risk of sounding stupid, what does "MOP" stand for?

-- 
Darrell (Daz) DeBoer
Principal Engineer, Gradleware
http://www.gradleware.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email


Reply via email to