Agreed.

On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Luke Daley <[email protected]>wrote:

>
> On 20/03/2013, at 7:51 AM, Szczepan Faber <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > I'd say it's slightly different in a parallel build where I'm fine if
> unit tests run in parallel with functional tests.
>
> Sure, but most of our CI builds don't use parallel execution.
>
> >
> > Cheers!
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Luke Daley <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 18/03/2013, at 9:27, Szczepan Faber <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> I'm wondering if it is the right time to start dogfooding this feature.
> For example, we could somewhat model the fast checks ordered before the
> slow checks. However, mustRunAfter does not quite fit this use case.
> >
> > Isn't this exactly what we want to run unit tests before functional
> tests?
> >
> >>
> >> Cheers!
> >>
> >> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Luke Daley <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 17/03/2013, at 23:11, Szczepan Faber <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I'm wondering if there's a better name for the 'mustRunAfter' api
> method. 'mustRunAfter' somewhat communicates that the source task will be
> scheduled automatically if the target task is selected. I realise that
> there might not be anything better. I was thinking about something like
> task.orderingRules.after(someOtherTask) or task.orderedAfter(someOtherTask).
> >>
> >> This is a good point.
> >>
> >> It's reasonable to think that a user would interpret mustRunAfter in
> this way. Given that this would mean that mustRunAfter is the same as
> dependsOn though, maybe that's enough of a hint that it has different
> semantics.
> >>
> >> I quite like the idea of adding an interim DSL here too…
> >>
> >> order.mustBeAfter x
> >> order.shouldBeAfter x
> >>
> >> Given that the task namespace is a user namespace, we should be
> conservative about using it.
> >>
> >> The 'order' object could also be queryable for ordering rules.
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 12:59 AM, Adam Murdoch <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 18/03/2013, at 7:33 AM, Marcin Erdmann <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> As the code has now made it into master shouldn't this issue be
> marked as resolved?
> >>>
> >>> Not quite yet, as there are a few other use cases bundled up in that
> issue. I guess the right thing to do would be to add new issues for the use
> cases we haven't fixed yet and close the issue.
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 07/03/13 09:29, Taytay wrote:
> >>>>> As someone who has been following  this bug
> >>>>> <http://issues.gradle.org/browse/GRADLE-427>   closely for a while,
> let me
> >>>>> take a moment to thank you for the work you've done here erdi!
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> View this message in context:
> http://gradle.1045684.n5.nabble.com/Must-run-after-ordering-tp5710924p5710986.html
> >>>>> Sent from the gradle-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
> >>>>
> >>>>   http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Adam Murdoch
> >>> Gradle Co-founder
> >>> http://www.gradle.org
> >>> VP of Engineering, Gradleware Inc. - Gradle Training, Support,
> Consulting
> >>> http://www.gradleware.com
> >>>
> >>> Join us at the Gradle Summit 2013, June 13th and 14th in Santa Clara,
> CA: http://www.gradlesummit.com
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Szczepan Faber
> >>> Principal engineer@gradleware; Lead@mockito
> >>> Join me at the Gradle Summit 2013, June 13th and 14th in Santa Clara,
> CA: http://www.gradlesummit.com
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Szczepan Faber
> >> Principal engineer@gradleware; Lead@mockito
> >> Join me at the Gradle Summit 2013, June 13th and 14th in Santa Clara,
> CA: http://www.gradlesummit.com
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Szczepan Faber
> > Principal engineer@gradleware; Lead@mockito
> > Join me at the Gradle Summit 2013, June 13th and 14th in Santa Clara,
> CA: http://www.gradlesummit.com
>
> --
> Luke Daley
> Principal Engineer, Gradleware
> http://gradleware.com
>
> Join me at the Gradle Summit 2013, June 13th and 14th in Santa Clara, CA:
> http://www.gradlesummit.com
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>
>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
>
>


-- 
Szczepan Faber
Principal engineer@gradleware; Lead@mockito
Join me at the Gradle Summit 2013, June 13th and 14th in Santa Clara, CA:
http://www.gradlesummit.com

Reply via email to